Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

19 February 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< February 18	February 20 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

HuMo-gen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT. The best coverage I could find is four sentences in this paper. Even this source has dubious reliability: it cites two research articles in this sub-paragraph ([1], [2]), but neither of them mention HuMo-gen. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Software, and Netherlands. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Typesetter CMS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, many of the sources don't even support the given statement. Greenman (talk) 06:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Features of Spider-Man media

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe (3rd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, this is the last of those three fictional universe descriptions in a list form. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST; Wikipedia articles are not places for pure plot summaries, and as a list, this is too broad (list of all fictional in-universe concepts related to Spider-Man). PS. Also, on the off chance this is kept, this would need renaming to the list of something format. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:50, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Comics and animation, and Lists. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:50, 12 February 2025 (UTC) PS. Looking closely, this article is not even an attempt at a comprehensive list; it is just a short but in-depth description of just three entities that would unlikely have survived on their own and were cobbled tougher in attempt to hide from GNG: "Empire State University", "Midtown High School" and "Ravencroft" (prison). The latter currently has a poor stand-alone article, which is not even linked from this fancrufty mess here.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge and consolidate into Spider-Man: While this can definitely be improved upon, I am not leaning as strongly on retaining this one as the others because it could be consolidated into the Spider-Man article with considerable details removed (namely the exhaustive list of school students and faculty). Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Trailblazer101 I am curious what difference do you see here? I struggle to find any myself. (And on a side note, splitting Marvel and Marvel Cinematic stuff is still puzzling to me, as so much of it is redundant - how about at least merging the two other articles into one?) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:49, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Marvel Comics and MCU are two separate franchises, so a merge is not a viable option there. I'm not sure how the content from this list could be implemented into the Spidey article or to what extent, though I would imagine a trimmed section for related attributes of the character's features from the schools to his web-shooters, costumes, etc. could suffice. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:51, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article was created in the first place so we would not need to have separate articles on each school and business associated with Spider-Man (all of which could survive as freestanding articles, given their representation across multiple media over decades). This should have the same outcome as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe (3rd nomination), both of which are on track to be kept resoundingly. BD2412 T 01:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Similar articles regularly get deleted; they have no stand-alone notability (if they had, they'd have their own articles). Adding them to a list is just listcruft. 0+0+0 still equals 0. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are items listed in this article that already have stand-alone notability, beginning with the Daily Bugle. BD2412 T 02:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While it may appear that way to you, there are several editors of these comic-related articles who would disagree with that assertion (based on the two other AfDs). Each of these entries could stand as individual articles but were agreed to be merged into this singular list via prior discussions and consensus in those that a singular list would better highlight all of these features related to the character as opposed to being separate articles. There is nothing which precludes such compiled lists from existing, and there are decent sources, with potential for more to be added rather than a complete deletion which would break countless links and leave out much information from this encyclopedia that our readers would be searching for. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and consolidate into Spider-Man per Trailblazer. I was worried this would be some massive pile of information to sift through, but the info in the article is relatively concise. Barring the three locations with pre-existing articles, there are two schools and one prison. These locations contain a lot of unneeded information (Do we really need lists of minor characters without articles?) and can be trimmed quite easily to slot somewhere into the Spider-Man article. All locations, including those with articles, can be mentioned in brief there, with a summary explaining what each location is and why it is important to the Spider-Man mythos. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:CSC point 2. Jclemens (talk) 08:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
CSC only applies if none meet notability, which is blatantly false when three of the article's entries have their own articles. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:01, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An all-or-nothing rule seems ill-considered here, given that Wikipedia has tons of lists of instances for which some are notable and have articles while others are not (e.g., List of mayors of Florence). BD2412 T 17:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of a list is often based on the notability of the subject group. Largely unfamiliar with your hyperlinked article, but an important governmental position is likely to be more covered in sources than a list of fictional locations with no sourcing showcasing real world relevance. Many of the subjects in the list are entirely non-notable, and the subject itself isn't notable, either. Notability should not be inherited from the few locations that are notable, either.

Also note that CSC 2 says that "Before creating a stand-alone list, consider carefully whether such lists would be better placed within a "parent" article." CSC 2 isn't exactly a blanket keep statement, even if all the subjects fail notability. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 17:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My reasoning here is that Spider-Man is an article on a specific fictional character, not the entire universe this character occupies, which is separately notable. Although this universe is a subset of the Marvel Comics universe it has locations and characters (many of these separately notable) that arise from it and that are specific to Spider-Man media. This is reflected in fact that there are three separate film franchises, including the 1970s one, around this character and their environs completely unconnected to the MCU or anything else Marvel. Of course, there is also the MCU-adjacent film series, which also reflects the locations and character specific to the Spider-Man universe. Perhaps the title of this article needs to be adjusted to reflect that or the criteria for inclusion of content needs to be clarified, but it will not be at all difficult to demonstrate GNG worthy coverage at this fictional world I've tried with the character itself. BD2412 T 18:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is no indication the Universe of Spider-Man is a notable topic either, though. That's my main concern. Regardless of title, this is just a non-notable topic unless sourcing can be shown. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which is why there should be allowed time to find sources to prove whether it is or not, rather than forcing an AfD with inconclusive information. This is something to hash out at the list talk, not here. AfD should be a last resort, not a garbage dumb to prove a point. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm personally of the mind that if it's at AfD, we may as well stick with the discussion while it's here, but I see your point. Decided to do a quick source run to double check details. There's a fair few hits in News for Sony's shared movie universe, but that's already covered at Sony's Spider-Man Universe, and when Sony is removed, there's not much outside of trivial Wikipedia:VALNET hits, which don't count toward notability. There's a brief hit here [3], but that's very short and more discussing characters than locations. Outside of that, Books has little bar trivial mentions using it as a buzzword for Spider-Man media. I can't view every scholar hit, but there seems to be a lot of hits on the multiverse in Spider-Man, but again that's an entirely different subject. There may be some hits I missed but I did take a look through everything I could and found little. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep much as it is. Hyperbolick (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I mean seriously, this better be the last of these AFD abuses I find or you're going to ANI, dude. Barnt Toust 02:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@BarntToust Drop that tone and WP:REFACTOR yourself, or ANI it will be - for your violations of WP:CIV and WP:NPA. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus, you calling the work of the contributors "crap" is something that tells me you need to REFACTOR yourself, as no editor should be as brazen as you have been at these afds. Before you dig yourself into a bigger hole by getting ~~pissy~~ agitated with me, I strongly suggest you do as @Jclemens advised you on the MU afd; to quote them describing your conduct: deceptive, inappropriate, and your attitude is unbecomingly disrespectful to the people who build Wikipedia. Do better, and stop kicking sandcastles over just because you're an academic. Barnt Toust 03:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~@BD2412, as you were saying on the MU AfD, what are your thoughts on this? Barnt Toust 03:47, 15 February 2025 (UTC)~~ [reply]

Jesus, Piotrus, you should know better than being confrontational to other editors. Please, WP:Assume good faith and don't pick fights. That is not what this discussion is for. I would happily report either one for derailing this discussion and being uncivil towards each other, so I hope it doesn't have to come to that. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'm finna tap out and just fine-tune a page I've been working on. Sayonara. Barnt Toust 03:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm striking out some confrontational garbage I wrote. I got better things to write for better reasons. Barnt Toust 04:49, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For those who care, I have mended fences with BarnToust on my talk page - we are good. And I will also apologize for using the term 'crap'. While I consider the content in question to be low quality and IMHO mostly non-encyclopedic, I was too colloquial in my assessment :> _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This is inherently unsalvageable and redundant fancruft. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:13, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Little support for outright deletion, but there is no apparent consensus on whether this should be standalone page. Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 06:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

North Coast Computer Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in google news, 1 hit in google books and 3 small mentions in Australian database Trove. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 05:12, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Computing, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 05:12, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Beaver dam Czech Republic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant WP:NOTNEWS violation. Laun chba ller 04:59, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Events, Environment, and Czech Republic. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Coverage is with unreliable sources. Nothing is notable and this article also seems promotional. Also a open violation of WP:NOTNEWS. Article has to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sackiii (talk • contribs) 06:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Dawson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources provided are insufficient for general notability guideline as shown by source analysis (below), in which at most one source is acceptable. WP:BEFORE did not retrieve better sources, in particular for Jet ski at the 2023 SEA Games which one would expect some recent coverage about.

Source assessment table prepared by User:Bri
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dawndawsond2/	subject's SPS can not be used for notability	claims about education do not have an exception in WP:ABOUTSELF	The article discusses the subject directly and in detail	✘ No
http://www.reflectionsadvertising.com/works/	not independent; employer	presumed reliable for WP:ABOUTSELF material	has part of subject's name in email address, no other bio details	✘ No
https://aafcos.com/past-winners-silver-medal-award/	not independent; uses awarding org. as citation of award	presumed reliable for WP:ABOUTSELF material	provides a year and a name, no details about what was award-worthy	✘ No
https://www.csbj.com/2001/09/28/how-a-co-springs-ad-agency-owner-became-a-world-champion-jet-skier/		Business Journal generally reliable	Dead link, not archived, can not be retrieved for assessment	? Unknown
https://www.ijsba.com/results/2000/results2000wf_overall_expert.htm	source states that this subj is an affiliate of their org (see quote)	presumed reliable for WP:ABOUTSELF material	passing mention: "The event is being organized, in part, by longtime IJSBA announcer (and racer) Dawn Dawson..."	✘ No
https://www.ijsba.com/flora-bama-grand-prix-this-weekend-april-13-15-pensacola-florida/	coverage of org's own event	presumed reliable for WP:ABOUTSELF material	passing mention of announcer at an event	✘ No
http://mulletwrapper.net/emerald-coast-grand-prix-jet-ski-race-april-13-15-at-bama/		local alt-weekly not considered reliable. At RSN another editor said "somewhat reliable for coverage of its local area" which could mean reliable for the fact that they announced the event.	passing mention of announcer/coordinator for an event	✘ No
http://nzjetski.co.nz/2012-nz-jet-sports-nationals			passing mention: "The Canterbury Club flew the lovely international jet ski announcer Dawn Dawson all the way from her home in the USA, Dawn kept the large crowd informed and entertained all weekend with her cheeky banter."	✘ No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNYnCj7Bk8A	Independence of un-authenticated YT uploader is impossible to determine (possibly pseudonymous).	YouTube clips can not be used for notability (WP:YOUTUBE) with rare exceptions. This is an upload by some individual of their personal video and should be treated as non-reliable SPS.	the subject's name is credited in the video description as an announcer, nothing more	✘ No
https://www.csindy.com/Promoted/archives/2018/08/07/local-announcer-dawn-dawson-goes-to-indonesia-for-2018-asian-games		local alt-weekly, not useful for notability		✘ No
https://www.ijsba.com/australian-national-championships-april-29-30/	about own event: "the AJSBA is proud to once again present the highest level of jetsports competition in Australia says President"	presumed reliable for WP:ABOUTSELF material	passing mention: "This year we welcome... Dawn Dawson providing expert commentary..."	✘ No
http://www.blowsionsurfslam.com/news/	website about own event	presumed reliable on basic facts	passing mention: "Esteemed Surfslam announcers Mike Young and Dawn Dawson will be on hand all weekend assisting the web stream" (archived)	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

☆ Bri (talk) 04:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I tried to find an archived link for that colarado springs business journal link on wayback machine and in the csbj's own archives, but failed. I agree with the source review that the other references are passing, promotional or not-independent. --Spacepine (talk) 05:10, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople, Women, Television, Advertising, Colorado, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 São Paulo King Air F90 crash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTNEWS. Per WP:COOKIE "a common, everyday, ordinary item that does not stand out from the rest". Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 04:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 04:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. A small plane crash that isn't inherently notable at this point in time. --Spacepine (talk) 04:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Brazil. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is not a major enough crash to get a wiki page. Lucthedog2 Talk 05:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTNEWS. LibStar (talk) 05:55, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the others, or alternatively, redirect to Beechcraft King Air#Accidents and incidents where the crash is mentioned. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 06:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moh Saaduddin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:JOURNALIST. Lack of notability has been tagged since January 2019. — Chrisahn (talk) 04:12, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Collabrification

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about non-notable neologism which seems to exist to promote a research direction from one specific research group. TheDragonFire (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. TheDragonFire (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:29, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mull, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to have been a short-lived post office, not a town. It certainly isn't one now. Mangoe (talk) 03:32, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:29, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moralist (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I seem to keep coming across redundant and unnecessary DAB pages like this. The entries include a WP:PTM (French Moralists); a redundant, superfluous, and frankly confusing reference to Wiktionary; an extremely niche video game faction; and a redirect from a phrase not used at its target that is at best a PTM anyway (Scientific moralist). In accordance with WP:PARTIAL, if this DAB page were cleaned up, all that would really be left are Moralism and The Moralist. I think a hatnote on the former acknowledging the existence of the latter will suffice. — Anonymous 02:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy, Social science, and Disambiguations. — Anonymous 02:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Corner, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have mixed feelings about this, in large part because it is an African-American place, and the documentation on these tends to be sketchy. The issue here, however, is that once again the article does not accurately relate what the thesis (which is the only source I could find outside GNIS) says about the place. The key failure is in the statement that "it was the home of several families [of] free African Americans", because it says that about the whole Cabin Creek Settlement. The "Scott's Corner" part pertains only to the store, due to the name of the proprietor. It doesn't actually say there was a town there, and it doesn't say that people lived at the corner. At least, that's how it reads to me. And it's basically an isolated intersection now, and furthermore, the aerials indicate that the two houses on the NE corner are recent, and that there was once another building on the SE corner which disappeared around 2010. It might have been the store at some point, or maybe not. It would be nice to find something else to go by, but for instance the county history (which was written early as these things go) doesn't mention it. So reluctantly I think this will need to go unless someone can find better verification. Mangoe (talk) 02:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Randolph now, eh? I was wondering what county was going to be next after Jay. ☺
The interesting thing is that the Tucker History does have an entire section (p.134) on the "Cabin Creek Colored Settlement" which has a lengthy laundry list of Scotts. It seems that Cabin Creek, Indiana (running from 40°10′07″N 085°09′45″W / 40.16861°N 85.16250°W / 40.16861; -85.16250 (mouth of Cabin Creek, Indiana) on the White River to 40°03′50″N 85°04′05″W / 40.064°N 85.068°W / 40.064; -85.068) is the real subject here. It has a fair number of sources both as the settlement and as a creek.
The severalfold irony is that the rôte GNIS mass-importers did not give it to us because (a) the GNIS record had it marked as "stream" not "ppl", and (b) the second GNIS record for Cabin Creek that said it was an alternative name for Lamb Ditch, which leads from Cabin Creek at 40°08′38″N 85°08′02″W / 40.144°N 85.134°W / 40.144; -85.134 (mouth of Lamb Ditch, Indiana) past its name at 40°07′16″N 085°07′46″W / 40.12111°N 85.12944°W / 40.12111; -85.12944 (label of Lamb Ditch, Indiana) right to this "Scott Corner", which in turn the GNIS said was "canal" with no clue that it was part of the Cabin Creek true populated place that is in the history books.
Uncle G (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Batcycle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure plot summary and list of apperances; the bit on development is unreferenced and there is no reception, not even any listicles. Fails WP:GNG and my BEFORE failed to find anything that's not a plot summary. Since it's just plot, not seeing what we can do here except merge a few sentences (lead?) to Batman#Technology. (If anyone cares, Batsub was just blodly blanked and redirected looong time ago without any AfD... there was also a Batboat, I think). The concepts are mentioned briefly in the suggested redirect target - that's probably enough for now... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Batman#Technology. There is at least some commentary in secondary sources on individual incarnations: [4], [5], [6], p. 70, [7], [8]. Daranios (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Daranios. Some decent hits, but nowhere near enough for a viable article, though viable merge targets exist. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Per WP:NEXIST. Got SIGCOV in Batman's Arsenal, Batman: The Ultimate Guide as well as an Article on the Batpod. I wouldn't be surprised if there's more out there, given this is Batman. A lack of willingness to perform improvements to an independently notable topic is not an excuse for deletion or merger, which should be done when something is non-notable or massively overlapping. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

La calandria (1933 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced film article other than IMDB. Not clear this passes WP:GNG or WP:NFILM.4meter4 (talk) 01:29, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 01:29, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative redirect to the director, Fernando de Fuentes. My search on Google books turns up single-sentence mentions, but I'm not seeing enough to meet WP:GNG. It's quite possible that there's significant coverage in contemporary Mexican sources, so feel free to ping me if better coverage is found. Zeibgeist (talk) 04:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zulkarnain Saer Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The individual Zulkarnain Saer Khan partook in the orchestration of a dossier denominated All the Prime Minister's Men. Consequent to the helping of this dossier, he was the recipient of a commendation entitled the Global Shining Light Awards. The Global Shining Light Awards is bereft of eminence or substantial prestige in any capacity. The mere attainment of the Global Shining Light Awards does not fullfill the criteria of notability (person), as the dossier All the Prime Minister's Men itself fails to consummately fulfill the stringent prerequisites of notability.

Furthermore, the article is an absolute dearth of elucidation absent his academic credentials. Additionally, the article harbors superfluous and extraneous verbiage, including allusions to assailments perpetrated against his brother. Hydronex (talk) 20:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and Bangladesh. Shellwood (talk) 20:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Politics, and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:32, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just checked all the references and they seem above board. Meets point 3 of WP:NJOURNALIST, played a major role in creating a well known work (All the Prime Minister's Men). His career has also received WP:SIGCOV. Orange sticker (talk) 11:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Point three of Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals states:

"The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."

But no other work by the individual in the article can be found apart from All the Prime Minister's Men, and All the Prime Minister's Men is neither a significant nor a well-known work. This means the individual does not fulfill point three of Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals. Hydronex (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: All the Prime Minister's Men is definitely a well-known work. It got wide coverage in Bangladeshi and some international media apart from Al Jazeera Media.[9][10][11][12][13] [14] Al Jazeera also won the top prize for "Best Human Rights Journalism" (investigation category) in the 8th annual Amnesty Media award for 'All the Prime Minister's Men'.[15] Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 09:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable investigative journalist in Bangladesh. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 08:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notable journalist in Bangladesh. He is widely recognized for impactful investigative work with Al Jazeera and OCCRP. His contributions, media coverage, and awards meet Wikipedia’s notability criteria WP:NJOURNALIST.

— Cerium4B —Talk? • 11:18, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Cerium4B (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. (diff) Koshuri ^(グ) 13:55, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Koshuri Sultan, He hasn’t asked for any support in his favour. He has just asked me to take a look. Maybe because this article is related to Bangladesh. [16] — Cerium4B —Talk? • 14:10, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It is the responsibility of those who vote keep to provide a solid argument. Nothing can be gained from canvassed or paid votes. The article is highly promotional and lacks neutral tone. It overemphasizes achievements while downplaying controversies, making it more like a PR piece than an encyclopedic entry. The subject fails WP:NBLP, as most coverage comes from sympathetic or affiliated sources rather than independent, in-depth analysis. NXcrypto Message 04:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Hrksmp for removing your Keep. NXcrypto Message 14:42, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 00:45, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets notability guidelines. Multiple, reliable sources in the article. ConstantPlancks (talk) 07:37, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source review would be helpful. But, at the least, this should be a redirect to All the Prime Minister's Men which I'm surprised editors arguing for Delete didn't mention.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Silvia Dimitrov

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skater. Fails WP:NSKATE; no international senior-level medals, no national championships wins. On-line searches yield nothing beyond databases, scores, or a passing mention in articles detailing her previous skating partner, who went on to have more success than she did. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating, and Germany. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, this article has already been brought to AFD (just last month) so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Super culture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Super culture" doesn't seem to be an established term in anthropology. The book referenced actually says "To correspond with the term "sub-culture", a new term "super-culture" might be invented..." which suggests to me this is a term that was only used by few people. I don't think this warrants a redirect to "Culture", given that "Super culture" would be a very uncommon search term if it's not in use in anthropology. Kylemahar902 (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Behavioural science and Social science. Kylemahar902 (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Miyagishima

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former mayor of Las Cruces, New Mexico, which has a population of ~110k. Looking at the List of mayors of Las Cruces, New Mexico, the only one besides Miyagishima who has a Wikipedia page is Albert Johnson, who is obviously notable as the first black mayor anywhere in New Mexico. I don't see an argument for why Miyagishima rises above the notability level of a standard Las Cruces mayor. Between the news coverage already cited on the page and what I could find on Google, everything seems pretty run of the mill to me. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 01:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, Mississippi, and New Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:47, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kumawood

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Three deadlinks and all but one of the remainder are affiliated or interviews. Only the BBC source reliably confirms the existence of Kumawood. Searches reveal social media sources but nothing that amounts to a WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, and Ghana. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per nom. Nothing that configures notability or any relevant redirection to WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 10:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: if you search for news coverage about this award you will find plenty, especially from local news outlet. Have you consider these? FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Kindly keep. This article is notable and it speaks or provide insights to the Ghanaian local movie industry specifically in Kumasi. Jwale2 (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: [17] ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 01:44, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the multiple academic sources discussing Kumawood as linked in the previous comment above, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet, but "keep" !voters are invited to share specific sources rather than asserting notability or linking to a list of search results.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:05, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Woodman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional vanity page and almost certainly an WP:AUTOBIO by a non-notable individual. Fails WP:NOTRESUME, WP:NOTPROMO. Fails WP:GNG for lack of WP:SIGCOV in independent, secondary, reliable sources. Fails all criteria of WP:NACADEMIC as a relatively junior researcher with a low to mediocre h-index of 7 and no evidence of passing on any other criterion. The sources are entirely limited to institutions with which he was or is affiliated, or to his own articles. WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing else qualifying. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for reasons given above. FYI: I and another editor removed large amounts of content - mine because my opinion was that it did not contribute to notability and the other editor stated reason as content was promotional. So the cuts were not of content that would support keeping the article. David notMD (talk) 04:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Medicine, Saudi Arabia, and California. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:too soon for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]